![]() 6 In his expert report, Wolfson calculated Lawrence’s 1 R. 5 GLDD filed a motion in limine challenging the admissibility of Wolfson’s anticipated expert testimony. 4 He alleges that his injuries are the direct result of GLDD’s negligence and the vessel’s unseaworthiness. ![]() In December 2015, Lawrence was injured while working as a seaman aboard the M/V TEXAS JUNIOR (“the vessel”) as a GLDD employee. For the following reasons, the motion is denied. Lawrence urges the Court to reconsider its order 2 granting defendant Great Lake Dredge & Dock Company, L.L.C.’s (“GLDD”) motion 3 in limine to exclude certain opinions from Lawrence’s expert economist, Shael N. Lawrence, Jr.’s (“Lawrence”) motion1 for reconsideration. OF LOUISIANA SECTION I ORDER & REASONS Before the Court is plaintiff Earl K. ![]() 17-9775 GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK COMPANY, L.L.C. 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA EARL K. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, L.L.C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |